Miles Davis
"Bitches Brew"

On the plus
side, there is great subtlety and control expressed in the playing and the
album is extremely well recorded. Considering how many musicians are all
playing at the same time on some of the tracks (two or three drummers, two
bassists, guitar, two keyboards, trumpet, saxophone, clarinet) and that much of
the music is being created spontaneously, it is impressive that things do not
sink into chaos. There is a strong tonal and rhythmic centre to all of the
tracks and the musicians all appear to be playing with sufficient space not to
get in each other's way. There is considerable organisational skill involved in
bringing together musicians who have not played together much before and have
them create a detailed, delicate backdrop for the lead instruments to play
over.
However, I do
not find the end result to be interesting, while acknowledging that it is
skilful and clever. If this is an early example of jazz musicians being
influenced by the rock style then they have failed to learn the one thing that
makes rock music compelling, namely excitement. There is no dynamism to this
music, no progression, no heading towards a climax, nothing that compels listening.
It just exists. The consistent tonal and rhythmic centre mean that it is not
that much of a challenge to listen to. To be honest, the biggest enemy is
boredom. Nothing happens that makes this music hold my attention.
Particularly
when John McLaughlin's guitar is audible, I am reminded of some of King
Crimson's musical interludes (like those in "Pictures of a City" and
"Moonchild"). However, being a rock group, Crimson remember to
surround their outre musical exploration with actual songs. "Bitches Brew"
sounds like Miles Davis got a group of musicians together and said I want to
record an album that sounds like the middle section of "Pictures of a
City".
Last thing, I
was never that over keen on the title of the lp either.
No comments:
Post a Comment